Generally when you read the New Yorks Times you feel like you aren’t just eating meat and potatoes, but have all this best and on a silver platter too. Enter Saul Hansell, like a fly in your soup, to ruin your perfectly good meal.

I think every journalist not only has the burden of research, the toil of producing a good story, but also a moral obligation to get it right, and to be held accountable for inaccuracy, especially when your work is read by so very many, and taken as fact. When your works defame another, and do so in a false matter, you have to answer for it. Well Saul, I hope you read this, and I fervently hope you apologize, in the same public manner you performed this egregious action.

Armand Rousso is a fine man, helping everyone he comes into contact with, which is far more documented than anything he did previously. What’s Mr. Hansell done to improve society one might ask, but people don’t come out nd publicly ask that. And that’s because its worng to put a person down for no reason, instead its praised to point out when a person does good. So today, I will do just that.

Mr. Rousso has created many many jobs, which in turns has enriched the lives those individuals and their families. Thats touching a lot of people, and the creation of jobs is no small feat. The government has yet to duplicate it so effectively in my opinion.

Furthermore, Armand Rousso is a major fundraiser for multiple humanitarian organizations that seek to aid people. These organizations include but are not limited to, Children’s Rights, Notre Dame Refugee Center, the United Nations, the New York School of Medicine. The list of beneficial accomplishments could continue, but even as it stands, how many can make these claims? Can Mr. Hansell?

Accept responsibility for your poorly researched article Saul Hansell, with its misleading words, and slanderous agenda.

Armand Rousso response to NYT story by Saul Hansell has more facts regarding this.